Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 F.2d 603 - United States v. Salgado

United States v. Salgado’s Empirical Analysis

807 F.2d 603 · 1986

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
5
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably United States v. Markling (1993), United States v. Santa (2000)

18 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

1601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Nix v. Williams · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Welsh v. Wisconsin · Segura v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the interest of society in deterring unlawful police conduct and the public interest in having juries receive all probative evidence of a crime are properly balanced by putting the police in the same, not a worse, position than they would have been in if no police error or misconduct had occurred.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The exclusionary rule is a sanction, and sanctions are supposed to be proportioned to the wrong-doing that they punish.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Courts should take a very hard line against the search of a person's home without a warrant or consent; and, therefore, [courts should] demand a genuine showing of an emergency before they will excuse the police's failure to obtain a warrant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.