Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 F.2d 783 - Webb v. Tom Brown, Inc.

Webb v. Tom Brown, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

807 F.2d 783 · 1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Pacific Employers Ins Co v. Industrial Accident Commission of California · Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co. · Begay v. Kerr-McGee Corp. · Kindle v. Cudd Pressure Control, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is more accurate to characterize the reason for the dismissal of the complaint as the court's belief that the complaint, as a matter of law, did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted because the exclusive remedy provision of [the state workers' compensation statute] barred a common law negligence claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.