United States v. Click’s Empirical Analysis
807 F.2d 847 · 1987
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2002 · most notably United States v. Alexander (1995), United States v. Mathews (1987)
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3013
Relies on New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Chevrolet Motor Division, General Motors Corp. · United States v. Foster · Twin Parks Ltd. Partnership v. N.S.C. Contractors, Inc. · United States v. Best · United States v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is proper for an appellate court to affirm a correct decision of a lower court even when that decision is based on an inappropriate ground.”); see also Helvering v. Gowran, 302 U.S. 238 , 245-47, 58 S.Ct. 154 , 158, 82 L.Ed. 224 (1937) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Doe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.