Wright v. Excel Paralubes’s Empirical Analysis
807 F.3d 730 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on 731 So. 2d 208 - Reeves v. Structural Preservation Systems · Doddy · 635 So. 2d 188 - Weber v. State · Beavers v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · Otto Candies Llc v. Nippon Kaiji Kyokai Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen any “principal” ... undertakes to execute any work, which is a part of his trade, business, or occupation and contracts with any ... “contractor”, for the execution ... of the whole or any part of the work undertaken by the principal, the principal, as a statutory employer, shall be granted the exclusive remedy protections of R.S. 23:1032 and shall be liable to pay to any employee employed in the execution of the work or to his dependent, any compensation under this Chapter which he would have been liable to pay if the employee had been immediately employed by him. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.