Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 F. Supp. 500 - Geisel v. Odulio

807 F. Supp. 500 - Geisel v. Odulio’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1995
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Walker v. Armco Steel Corp. · Bank Leumi Le-Israel v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] person filing a claim may recover from the fund only if. . . the fund is named as a party in the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 196 Wis. 2d 474 - Geiger v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
  2. “provide an adequate defense of the fund on any claim filed that may potentially affect the fund....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 196 Wis. 2d 474 - Geiger v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
  3. “Request for mediation prior to court action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 196 Wis. 2d 474 - Geiger v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.