Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 So. 2d 1071 - State v. Johnson

807 So. 2d 1071 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 338 So. 2d 107 - State v. Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appellate review is rendered meaningless . . . and the interests of justice require that a defendant be afforded a new, fully-recorded trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.