State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Batson v. Kentucky · Boykin v. Alabama · Florida v. Bostick · Illinois v. Wardlow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has elapsed between a defendant's conviction on a predicate felony and his commission of a subsequent predicate felony, the state need not prove the date of discharge on the earlier sentence in the habitual offender proceedings. State v. Brooks, 01-864, p. 12 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/29/02), 807 So.2d 1090, 1101 , citing State ex rel. Clark v. Marullo, 352 So.2d 223, 230 (La.1977) and Humphrey, supra, 96-838 at 14, 694 So.2d at 1088 . In this case, more than the ten-year”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is from the date of discharge from state supervision, because the discharge can take place earlier than the theoretical date on which the sentence would have terminated due to pardon, commutation or good time credit, or it could take place later because of parole revocation. State v. Humphrey, 96-838, pp. 13-14 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/29/97) , 694 So.2d 1082, 1088 , writ denied, 97-1461 (La.11/7/97), 703 So.2d 35 . However, if less than the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“transcript of the taking of the guilty plea, one which reflects a colloquy between judge and defendant in which the defendant was informed of and specifically waived his right to trial by jury, his privilege against self incrimination, and his right to confront his accusers. Id. If the state introduces anything less than a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.