Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

807 So. 2d 173

Doyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 13, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-02-13

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2015

8 state decisions

Relies on 790 So. 2d 550 - Major v. State · Stretcher v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the order summarily denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, seeking to vacate his conviction based on the alleged involuntariness of his plea. See Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As we did in Stretcher, we certify the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

¶2WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE' DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

WARNER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
/807/so2d/173 · .json · Public domain