Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 323 So. 2d 597 - Florida State University v. Jenkins · 667 So. 2d 332 - Applegate v. NAT. HEALTH CARE · 501 So. 2d 1323 - Robinson v. Morrison, Inc. · 645 So. 2d 577 - Landrum v. JAMES RUMMER TIMBER HARV. · Holmes v. City of West Palm Beach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a party claims that a referee's decision was either untimely mailed or not received, appellate courts have held, on due process grounds, that the claimant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the timeliness issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.