Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 So. 2d 208 - State v. Irish

807 So. 2d 208 - State v. Irish’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Davis v. Alaska · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Payne v. Tennessee · Pulley v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not to be excluded solely because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact. However, in a criminal case, an expert witness shall not express an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to any issue in the case, including credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “exceedingly close to testimony that [in his opinion] the accused was guilty of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.