807 So. 2d 295 - State v. Noil’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[J]ury observation and circumstantial evidence can be used to infer the age of a defendant when no direct evidence of defendant's age is presented. State v. Day, 98-964 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/10/99) , 735 So.2d 56, 59 ; State v. Zihlavsky, 505 So.2d 761 (La.App. 2 Cir.1987); [ State v. ] Shelton, [ 545 So.2d 1285 (La.App. 2 Cir.1989)] supra; State v. Guidry, 94-897 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/95) , 651 So.2d 458 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.