807 So. 2d 401 - State v. Quitman County’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Sosna v. Iowa · Portman v. County of Santa Clara · 558 So. 2d 869 - Tucker v. Hinds County · State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when they assert a colorable interest in the subject matter of the litigation or experience an adverse effect from the conduct of the defendant, or as otherwise provided by law.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“more permissive in granting standing to parties who seek review of governmental actions.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“is limited by Art. III, § 2 of the United States Constitution to a review of actual cases and controversies. 807 So.2d at 405 . However,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.