Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

807 So. 2d 603

Murphy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 2001-06-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2018

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-06-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BASCHAB, Judge,

¶1concurring specially.

¶2This is the first time this court has had an opportunity to address an issue related to the new domestic violence statutes. I concur specially because I am acutely aware of the long-standing problem of inadequate bail amounts in domestic violence cases. The circuit court in this case obviously recognized the problem. Regarding the bail amount in this case, the court specifically stated, “While bail is extremely high, there is a clear and present danger to minor children due to one child being in custody of grandmother.” Although I appreciate the circuit court’s concern about the vulnerability of the victims, I am concerned that the setting of an excessive bail amount may go too far in the opposite *608direction and hinder the purposes of the new domestic violence statutes.

/807/so2d/603 · .json · Public domain