Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 SW2D 488 - Hagan v. Farris

Hagan v. Farris’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Davidson v. American Freightways, Inc. (2000), Kentucky Waterways Alliance v. Johnson (2008)

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

1001991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kaufman v. Kaufman's Adm'r · Fluor Constructors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Jacobs v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government · Robinette v. Branham · Barnes v. Department of Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n agency must be bound by the regulations it promulgates. Further, the regulations adopted by an agency have the force and effect of law. An agency’s interpretation of a regulation is valid, however, only if the interpretation complies with'the actual language of the regulation. KRS 13A.130 prohibits an administrative ‘body from modifying an administrative -regulation by internal policy or another form of action. (Internal citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is within the inherent power of a Court to give a decision prospective or retrospective application. It is further permissible to have a decision apply prospectively in order to avoid injustice or hardship. This is true where property rights are involved and parties have acted in reliance on the law as it existed, and a contrary result would be unconscionable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.