Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 807 SW2D 695 - Hackett v. Smith County

Hackett v. Smith County’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2013

6 state decisions

30199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 5 Smith & H. 518 - Peerless Construction Co. v. Bass · McCord v. Hays · Doyle v. City of Chattanooga · State Ex Rel. Ragsdale v. Sandefur · State Ex Rel. Weaver v. Ayers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For an act to be enforced by a writ of mandamus, the act must be purely “ministerial.” Peerless Construction Co. v. Bass, 158 Tenn. 518, 520 , 14 S.W.2d 732 (1929). If the right to have the act performed is doubtful, the right must be first established in some other form of action. Mandamus is a summary remedy, extraordinary in its nature, and to be applied only when a right has been clearly established. Peerless, 14 S.W.2d at 733 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.