Haskins v. United States Department of Army’s Empirical Analysis
808 F.2d 1192 · 1987
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2017 · most notably Diamond v. Atwood (1995), Laber v. Harvey (2006)
23 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Thus, the employing agency cannot challenge issués decided against it if the plaintiff does not seek de novo review”.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the district court is not bound by the administrative findings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Wjhen it is alleged that * * ⅜ there was more than one reason for the adverse employment action — we held that the causation standard, or ‘same decision’ test, of Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) applied. Blalock, 775 F.2d at 712. Under the Mt. Healthy test, once a plaintiff has met his or her burden of showing that the illegal conduct more likely than not was a motivating factor in the employment decision, the defendant must be given the opportunity to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the same decision would have been reached even in the absence of discrimination. See id. at 710-12. * * * If the [defendant] meets the burden of production, there is no Title VII liability. 7”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.