Cablevision Systems Development Company v. Motion Picture Association of America Inc US National Cable Television Association Inc’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2018
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co. · Huene v. United States · State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Deer Creek Park · In re Massachusetts Helicopter Airlines, Inc. · Ringwald v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[Consolidation is permitted as a matter of convenience and economy in administration, but does not merge the suits into a single cause, or change the rights of the parties, or make those who are parties in one suit parties in another.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“but was only for convenience of pre-trial and trial procedure). Even so, it is not at all clear which type of consolidation occurred here. The magistrate judge stated that the cases would be consolidated into”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]n order deciding fewer than all of several cases consolidated for all purposes does not become a final judgment, absent an 'express determination' to that effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phillips v. Heine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.