Robert Crandall v. Eureka Fluid Works, Third Party v. Borden Chemical Company, Third Party

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

Robert CRANDALLv.EUREKA FLUID WORKS, Third Party Plaintiff/
BORDEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Third Party Defendant/

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1987. Decided Jan. 27, 1987.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1987

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-01-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stephen Kimble, Tucson, Ariz., for third party plaintiff-appellant.

John Dames, Chicago, Ill., for third party defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Richard M. Bilby, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Before NELSON, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

The district court did not abuse its discretion in its partial denial of the motion for summary judgment filed by Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, Eureka Fluid Works, and in its grant of the motion for a directed verdict filed by Third Party Defendant/Appellee, Borden Chemical Company.

¶2

AFFIRMED.