Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 F.2d 429 - Campbell v. Otis Elevator Co.

Campbell v. Otis Elevator Co.’s Empirical Analysis

808 F.2d 429 · 1987

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2013

11 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

1201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f a jury charge misstates substantive state law and thereby prejudicially misleads the jury, the judgment may be reversed.... [However e]ven though state substantive law dictates the content of the charge, federal law governs the phrasing of the instructions and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.