Jordan v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
808 F.2d 733 · 1987
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Gross v. Burggraf Construction Co. (1995), Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa (1990)
19 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Smith v. Pollin · Ferrell v. Trailmobile, Inc. · Binks Manufacturing Co. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. · Bledsoe v. Garcia · Aune v. Reynders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellate procedure requires that an appellant's brief shall contain an argument with appellant's contentions with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Appellants who fail to argue [an] issue in their brief are deemed to have waived [it] on appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.