Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

808 F.2d 835

Docket No. 86-6660.

Lester v. Hayes

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 3, 1986. Decided Dec. 31, 1986.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1986-12-31

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Wright v. Collins · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board · Shah v. Td Hutto Oj Jm Icc Ra Ap Ss

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1986-12-31

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Wallace T. Lester, pro se.

Richard N. League, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Wallace T. Lester, a North Carolina inmate, seeks to appeal the district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Lester's habeas petition was referred to a magistrate who, after review and analysis of Lester's claims, recommended that relief be denied. Lester was notified of his right to object to the magistrate's recommendation and was advised that the failure to object would result in a waiver of appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, --- U.S. ---, 54 U.S.L.W. 4032 (Dec. 4, 1985); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir.1985). Lester filed no objections, and the district court adopted the magistrate's recommendation.

¶2

Lester noted this appeal. He failed, however, to file his notice of appeal within thirty days of entry of judgment as required by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). Moreover, he failed to request within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5) that the district court grant an extension of the appeal period based upon excusable neglect. Under these circumstances, we are without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Shah v. Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975 (1984).

¶3

We therefore deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss Lester's appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

/808/f2d/835 · .json · Public domain