Mencia v. Allred’s Empirical Analysis
808 F.3d 463 · 2015
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. · Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance · Mendoza v. Perez · 135 S. Ct. 513 - Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unlike the FLSA regulations, the [TEGL] do[es] not explicitly require that, a sheepherder’s hours must be difficult to compute,” but •”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.