Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 F.3d 525 - Travers v. Flight Services & Systems, Inc.

Travers v. Flight Services & Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

808 F.3d 525 · 2015

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Massachusetts District Court)

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 215

Relies on Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. · United States v. Zannino · Brooklyn Sav Bank v. O'Neil Dize · Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc. · McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An employee claiming to be aggrieved by a violation of [G. L. c. 149, § 33E, 52E, 148, 148AG48B, 148C, 150C, 152, 152A, 159C, or 190, or G. L. c. 151, § 19,] may, [ninety] days after the filing of a complaint with the attorney general, or sooner if the attorney general assents in writing, and within [three] years after the violation, institute and prosecute in his own name and on his own behalf, or for himself and for others similarly situated, a civil action for injunctive relief, for any damages incurred, and for any lost wages and other benefits; provided, however, that the [three-]year limitation period shall be tolled from the date that the employee or a similarly situated employee files a complaint with the attorney general alleging a violation of any of these sections until the date that the attorney general issues a letter authorizing a private right of action or the date that an enforcement action by the attorney general becomes final. An employee so aggrieved who prevails in such an action shall be awarded treble damages, as liquidated damages, for any lost wages and other benefits and shall also be awarded the costs of the litigation and reasonable attorneys’ fees.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only applies when the claimant's misconduct is directly related to the merits of the controversy between the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.