Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 F.3d 607 - United States v. Miller

United States v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

808 F.3d 607 · 2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1204 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 3232 · 18 U.S.C. § 3235 · 18 U.S.C. § 3236 · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 3238

Relies on Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey · United States v. Johnson · United States, v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno · United States v. Yousef · United States v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all offenses begun or committed upon the high seas, or elsewhere out of the jurisdiction of any particular State or district ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “where physical conduct occurred, and not where criminal intent was formed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the district in which the offender ... is arrested or first brought”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.