Thompson v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
808 F.3d 939 · 2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1432 (§ 321 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on De Sylva v. Ballentine · Miguel Noel Fierro v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Miguel Noel Fierro v. Janet Reno, Attorney General · Kevin Wedderburn v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Batista v. Ashcroft · RODRIGUEZ-TEJEDOR
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals' (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thompson v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.