Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 NE2D 652 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Kyles v. Whitley · Ring v. Arizona · Atkins v. Virginia · Zant v. Stephens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If an issue was known and available on direct appeal, but not raised, it is procedurally defaulted as a basis for relief in subsequent proceedings.”). We will consider those arguments only to the extent that they are relevant to his ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Finally, Hogan’s seventh argument asserts that the post-conviction court failed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law on additional claims”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.