Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 NE2D 670 - Ashba v. State

Ashba v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. State · Buchanan v. State · Rodriguez v. State · Weaver v. State · Dowdy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Indeed, it seems that the trial court here attempted to do as much "just from an eye contact trying to check and see whether or not, you know, there were any questions." Such a procedure is not erroneous. However, in its preliminary instructions, the trial court had told jurors that they could ask questions of the witnesses and would "be given an opportunity to do so prior to that witness being excused." The trial court's instruction did not tell jurors that it would be seanning their faces to see if they had questions. Consequently, the jurors may not have known when to ask their questions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A juror may be permitted to propound questions to a witness by submitting them in writing to the judge, who will decide whether to submit the questions to the witness for answer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “just from an eye contact trying to check and see whether or not, you know, there were any questions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.