Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 P.2d 1028 - State v. Wilcox

State v. Wilcox’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
10
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 81 Wash. App. 425 - State v. Hayes (1996), Nelson v. Salt Lake County (1995)

1 federal appellate · 41 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nebraska v. Wyoming · State v. Fulton · State v. Robbins · McNair v. Haywardd · State v. Burnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First, time does not become an element of an offense merely because the defendant pleads an alibi defense. Therefore, [the defendant] has no statutory or constitu tional right to a charge framed so as to facilitate an alibi defense. Second, it is doubtful that an alibi defense is a realistic possibility because [the defendant] had continual contact with the child.... ””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “fully apprised of the State's [knowledge] regarding the time, place, and date of the crimes, [and] any lack of factual specificity goes not to the constitutional adequacy of the notice, but to the credibility of the State's case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “generalized weighing of the completeness of the notice and its adequacy for the defendant's purposes against the background of the information legitimately available to the prosecuting authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.