Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 P2D 270 - Whiteaker v. State

Whiteaker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2019 · most notably State v. Sawyer (1993), State v. Jones (1994)

28 state decisions — followed in 13 states

120199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Green v. United States · Arizona v. Washington · Downum v. United States · Price v. Georgia · Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Not only did the trial court fail to expressly find a manifest necessity, but no such necessity could have been found. Nor would the ends of public justice have been defeated by simply asking the jury if they had reached a verdict on the manslaughter charge. If the answer had been in the negative, there would then have been a basis for the mistrial. If the answer had been that the jury had agreed on acquittal, then the defendant’s “valued right” would have been upheld. There was no necessity at all, much less a high degree of necessity, to declare a mistrial before making the inquiry requested. All possible alternatives to a mistrial must be considered, employed and found wanting before declaration of a mistrial over the defendant’s objection is justified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “trial court is constitutionally obligated to afford the jury an opportunity to render a partial verdict of acquittal on a greater offense when the jury is deadlocked only on an uncharged lesser included offense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “partial verdicts are often compromise verdicts and should not be considered final verdicts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.