Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 So. 2d 1237 - King v. State

808 So. 2d 1237 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

48 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Arizona v. Youngblood · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Cherek v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “King's sixth contention, that Apprendi applies to Florida's capital sentencing statute and the maximum sentence under the statute is death, has been decided adversely to King's position. See Mills v. Moore, 786 So.2d 532, 537-38 (Fla.2001), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1015 , 121 S.Ct. 1752 , 149 L.Ed.2d 673 (2001); see also Brown v. Moore, 800 So.2d 223 (Fla.2001) (rejecting claims that aggravating circumstances are required to be charged in indictment, submitted to jury during guilt phase, and found by unanimous jury verdict); Mann v. Moore, 794 So.2d 595, 599 (Fla.2001) (same). We are aware that the United States Supreme Court very recently granted certiorari in State v. Ring, 200 Ariz. 267 , 25 P.3d 1139 (2001), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 865 , 151 L.Ed.2d 738 (2002); however, we decline to grant a stay of execution following our precedent on this issue, on which the Supreme Court has denied certiorari. Thus, King is not entitled to relief on this issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[U]nless a criminal defendant can show bad faith on the part of the police, failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not constitute a denial of due process of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “of which no more can be said than that it could have been subjected to tests, the results of which might have exonerated the defendant”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.