Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 So. 2d 145 - Darling v. State

808 So. 2d 145 - Darling v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 103 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Frye v. United States · Franklin v. Lynaugh · Griffith v. United States · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co. · Cablevision Co. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rebut conclusively, every possible variation of events”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Where the only proof of guilt is circumstantial, no matter how strongly the evidence may suggest guilt, a conviction cannot be sustained unless the evidence is inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. The question of whether the evidence fails to exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence is for the jury to determine, and where there is substantial, competent evidence to support the jury verdict, we will not reverse.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “admits not only the facts stated in the evidence adduced, but also admits every conclusion favorable to the adverse party that a jury might fairly and reasonably infer from the evidence.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.