Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Huss represents a change in the law, but the ruling is not retroactive.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 887 So. 2d 1260 - Thompson v. State · 862 So. 2d 822 - Bryan v. State

2. “as Thompson asserted. Id. The Fifth District also concluded that the Huss ruling was not retroactive. Id. Finally, the Fifth District rejected Thompson's assertion that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter its judgment and characterized the argument as”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 887 So. 2d 1260 - Thompson v. State

3. “holding that the Huss change should not be retroactively applied.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 887 So. 2d 1260 - Thompson v. State