Van Ex Rel. White v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co. · Banks v. State Farm Ins. Co. · Berman v. De Chazal · 764 So. 2d 1041 - Doyle v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc. · Hester v. Sunbeam Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. A final judgment may be rendered and signed by the court, even though it may not grant the successful party or parties all of the relief prayed for, or may not adjudicate all of the issues in the case, when the court: (1) Dismisses the suit as to less than all of the parties, defendants, third party plaintiffs, third party defendants, or in-tervenors. (2) Grants a motion for judgment on the pleadings, as provided by Articles 965, 968, and 969. (3) Grants a motion for summary judgment, as provided by Articles 966 through 969, but not including a summary judgment granted pursuant to Article 966(E). (4) Signs a judgment on either the principal or incidental demand, when the two have been tried separately, as provided by Article 1038. I ?(5) Signs a judgment on the issue of liability when that issue has been tried separately by the court, or when, in a jury trial, the issue of liability has been tried before a jury and the issue of damages is to be tried before a different jury. (6) Imposes sanctions or disciplinary action pursuant to Article 191, 863, or 864 or Code of Evidence Article 510(G). B. (1) When a court renders a partial judgment or partial summary judgment or sustains an exception in part, as to one or more but less than all of the claims, demands,, issues, or theories against a party, whether in an original demand, reconventional demand, cross-claim, third-party claim,- or intervention, the judgment shall not constitute a final judgment unless it is designated as ”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) The relationship between the adjudicated and unadjudicated claims; (2) The possibility that the need for review might or might not be mooted by future developments in the trial court; (3) The possibility that the reviewing court might be obliged to consider the same issue a second time; and (4) Miscellaneous factors such as delay, economic and solvency considerations, shortening the time of trial, frivolity of competing claims, expense, and the like.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A summary judgment may be rendered dispositive of a particular issue, theory of recovery, cause of action, or defense, in favor of one or more parties, even though the granting of the summary judgment does not dispose of the entire case.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.