Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 So. 2d 979 - Bessent v. State

808 So. 2d 979 - Bessent v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · California v. Hodari D. · Knowles v. Iowa · McClain v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where there is conflicting testimony, the jury is the judge of the credibility of the witnesses.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Harper was not seized or arrested when he discarded the drugs. Harper was not in any form or fashion restrained or stopped at the time he threw down the cocaine, and the cocaine, therefore, was abandoned and not the fruit of an unlawful seizure or arrest ...[.] There was no error in the lower court’s finding that no stop or arrest had occurred at the time the matchbox hit the ground, and there existed no need to find probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[o]ur supreme court followed the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in California v. Hodari [D.] , 499 U.S. 621 , 111 S.Ct. 1547 , 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991), when it held that evidence seized after being abandoned by a suspect is not the fruit of an illegal seizure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.