Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 808 SW2D 76 - Stavinoha v. State

Stavinoha v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

1 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Grunsfeld v. State (1992), Ford v. State (1996)

1 district · 27 state decisions

160199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Enmund v. Florida · Booth v. Maryland · Murphy v. State · Miller-El v. State · Stiehl v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both Miller-El and the instant cause were tried before the effective date of the 1989 amendment to Article 37.07, § 3(a). In that amendment the Legislature provided that evidence , may be admitted at the punishment phase of trial “as to any matter the court deems relevant to sentencing, including” those matters previously made expressly admissible under the statute, viz: the prior criminal record of the defendant, his general reputation and his character. Query what the Legislature means by “relevance” in this context.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “admissibility of evidence at the punishment phase ... is a function of policy rather than relevancy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “had a bearing on [the defendant's] personal responsibility and his moral guilt,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.