Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 A2D 1107 - Cullen v. Auclair

Cullen v. Auclair’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

3 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton · Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. Austin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Right to privacy — Action for deprivation of right. — (a) Right to privacy created. It is the policy of this state that every person in this state shall have a right to privacy which shall be defined to include any of the following rights individually: (4) The right to be secure from publicity that reasonably places another in a false light before the public; (i) In order to recover for violation of this right, it must be established that: (A) There has been some publication of a false or fictitious fact which implies an association which does not exist; (B) The association which has been published or implied would be objectionable to the ordinary reasonable man under the circumstances[.]””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The elements of a cause of action for defamation are: (1) the utterance of a false and defamatory statement concerning another; (2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; (3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and (4) damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whether the meaning of a particular communication is defamatory is a question of law for the court to decide rather than a factual issue for a jury to determine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.