Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 A2D 607 - Winstead v. United States

Winstead v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Head v. United States · United States v. Gilliam · Rouse v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'A person commits the offense of carjacking if, by any means, that person knowingly or recklessly by force or violence, whether against resistance or by sudden or stealthy seizure or snatching, or by putting in fear, or attempts to do so, shall take from another person immediate actual possession of a person's motor vehicle.' " (Emphases added.) (quoting D.C. Code § 22 - 2803 (2001)). As the foregoing analysis shows, the carjacking statutes used in the federal system - 33 - No. 1-12-0654 and in other states, are far from "almost identical”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hile [the victim] remained at the wheel, it was [the defendant] who directed her movements and usurped actual physical control of the vehicle. It was no less a carjacking because [the defendant] took his victim along with the car.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.