United States v. Ramirez-Rizo’s Empirical Analysis
809 F.2d 1069 · 1987
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n · Butz v. Hein · Williams v. United States · United States v. Holley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In deciding whether a defendant's theory of defense was adequately submitted to the jury, we look to the trial as a whole including the arguments of counsel ... to determine whether the charge as supplemented by the argument adequately presented the defense to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.