Morris v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis
809 F.2d 1499 · 1987
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Henry v. State of Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All grounds for relief claimed by a petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus shall be raised by a petitioner in his original or amended petition. Any grounds not so raised are waived unless the Constitution of the United States or of this state otherwise requires or unless any judge to whom the petition is assigned, on considering a subsequent petition, finds grounds for relief asserted therein which could not reasonably have been raised in the original or amended petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lancaster v. Newsome“committed a procedural default in failing to pursue an ineffective assistance claim in his first state habeas proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Presnell v. Kemp“and thus had not effected a general waiver of the attorney-client privilege.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.