Moore v. Fenex, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
809 F.2d 297 · 1987
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2012 · most notably Central Bank of Denver Na v. First Interstate Bank of Denver Na K (1994), State v. Warner (1990)
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Fisher v. United States · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,464 Securities and Exchange Commission v. William v. Coffey, and John M. King · Umbaugh Pole Building Co. v. Scott · Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co. · O'Neill v. Kiledjian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As to the third requirement [regarding knowing and substantial assistance in the violation], the analysis required by this factor must be particularly exacting in cases involving non-disclosure. Washington County, 676 F.2d at 226 . The plaintiffs must show that the silence of the accused aider and abettor 'was consciously intended to aid the securities law violation,’ and must prove either a culpable state of mind, or conduct from which a culpable state of mind can be inferred. Id.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... “some other party has committed a securities law violation, if the accused party had general awareness that his role was part of an overall activity that is improper, and if the accused aider-abettor knowingly and substantially assisted the violation.””
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Some other party has committed a securities law violation, (2) The defendant had general awareness that his role was part of an overall activity that was improper, and (3) The defendant knowingly and substantially assisted in the violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.