Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 F.2d 339 - United States v. Neuroth

United States v. Neuroth’s Empirical Analysis

809 F.2d 339 · 1987

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably United States v. Williams (1991), United States v. Phillip (1991)

27 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

23019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Rose v. Clark · Bollenbach v. United States · Parker v. Randolph · Goldstein v. Garrity · Yazoo County Industrial Development Corp. Et Al. v. Suthoff Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here an error is not of constitutional dimension, it is harmless unless it is more probable than not that the error materially affected the verdict.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “dates alleged in an indictment. We stated in United States v. Neuroth, 809 F.2d 339 , 342 (6th Cir.1987): 19 The type of crime should also be considered. For instance, with some crimes, such as conspiracy, the proof is often nebulous as to exactly when the crime occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “language would be preferable in such a case, as compared to cases involving more”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.