Slicker v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis
809 F.2d 768 · 1987
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2009
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hill v. Lockhart · Westbrook v. Zant · McCoy v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stano v. Dugger · Stano v. Dugger“If [petitioner] alleges facts that, if true, would entitle him to relief [under Hill ], the district court should order an evidentiary hearing on the merits of his claim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Yordan v. Dugger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.