Mitchael v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
809 F.3d 1050 · 2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 42 U.S.C. § 404 (§ 204 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 415 (§ 215 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation · James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia · Wolcott v. Sebelius · Belles v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden of proving federal court jurisdiction is on the party seeking to invoke federal jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.