Cogburn v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
809 F.3d 1232 · 2016
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 7292
Relies on Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Szemraj v. Principi · Adams v. Shinseki · Munro v. Shinseki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The claimant will be notified of any decision affecting the payment of benefits or granting relief. Notice will include the reason for the decision and the date it will be effectuated as well as the right to a hearing subject to paragraph (c) of this section. The notification will also advise the claimant of his right to initiate an appeal by filing a Notice of Disagreement which will entitle him to a Statement of the case for his assistance in perfecting his appeal. Further, the notice will advise him of the periods in which an appeal must be initiated and perfected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ruel v. Wilkie“with respect to the validity of a decision of the Court on a rule of law or of any statute or regulation ... or any interpretation thereof ... that was relied on by the Court in making the decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ruel v. Wilkie“We review a claim of legal error in a decision of the Veterans Court without deference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Acree v. O'rourke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.