Crawford v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
809 F.3d 404 · 2015
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Prosch v. Apfel · Goff v. Barnhart · Robinson v. Sullivan · Thompson v. Bowen · Eichelberger v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he symptoms [the claimant] attested to are inconsistent with the objective medical evidence found on the record, and hence, need not be given great weight when considered against objective medical evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence from acceptable medical sources'.” 20 C.F.R. § 416.913 (a). Such acceptable medical sources include licensed physicians, licensed or certified psychologists, licensed optometrists, licensed podiatrists, and qualified speech language pathologists. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wigfall v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.