Bradley v. Sugarbaker’s Empirical Analysis
809 F.3d 8 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Casas Office Machines, Inc. v. Mita Copystar America, Inc. · Harnish v. Children's Hospital Medical Center · In the Matter of Spring · Mitchell v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the negligence claim does not appear ever to have reached the jury: the verdict form only references Mrs. Bradley's informed consent claim, and the jury instructions were limited to the elements of informed consent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Mrs. Bradley did not have enough information to "ma[k]e an informed choice [as to] whether to undergo less intrusive methods for obtaining biopsy tissue than an open surgical biopsy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an outpatient procedure in which a radiologist inserts a long, hollow needle through the skin and into the mass to extract cells,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.