Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 F.3d 898 - United States v. Hamad

United States v. Hamad’s Empirical Analysis

809 F.3d 898 · 2016

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on United States v. Olano · Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc. · New York v. Burger · United States v. Biswell · Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in effect consents to the restrictions put in place by the government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “business owner in a highly regulated or licensed industry”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.