Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 F. Supp. 1020 - Doe v. Blake

809 F. Supp. 1020 - Doe v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 29 U.S.C. § 794

Relies on Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Schiavone v. Fortune · Florida v. Royer · Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “circumvention [of the policy behind the privilege] by affording an almost equally unrestricted action under a different label”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.