Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 FSUPP 666 - Ferguson v. McCaughtry

Ferguson v. McCaughtry’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 1996
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Barefoot v. Estelle · Johnson v. Gramley · 586 F. Supp. 413 - Wilks v. Young · Gordon v. Secretary of State of Wis.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a habeas corpus proceeding ... an appeal by the applicant for the writ may not proceed unless a district or a circuit judge issues a certificate of probable cause. If an appeal is taken by the applicant, the district judge who rendered the judgment shall either issue a certificate of probable cause or state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.