Lozano v. Alvarez’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 11601 (International Child Abduction Remedies Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Relies on Young v. United States · Abbott v. Abbott · Friedrich v. Friedrich · Felix Blondin v. Marthe Dubois · Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether to exercise its discretion and repatriate the child even though she is now settled in New York.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'to ensure that he obtains regular contact with his [child] and plays an active role in [her] life.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fundamental principles ... relating to the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.